2 Jun
2016
2 Jun
'16
6:02 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:06:26PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 2 June 2016 at 20:29, Javi Merino javi.merino@arm.com wrote:
In 5a31d594a973 ("cpufreq: Allow freq_table to be obtained for offline CPUs") you did the opposite: don't use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() because it won't give you the policy of a cpu that is offline. Now you are arguing that we should go back to cpufreq_cpu_get() which implicitly calls cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(). Won't we hit the same issue that 5a31d594a973 was trying to prevent: that we can't get a freq_table for a cpu that is offline?
Yes, that should be fixed. Thanks for letting me know about it :)
Ok, that was my only nit. Other than that, it looks good to me. For cpu_cooling.c
Acked-by: Javi Merino javi.merino@arm.com