On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Matthias Brugger matthias.bgg@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/01/16 11:23, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
Hi Michael, Pi-Cheng,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Michael Turquette mturquette@baylibre.com wrote:
On 12/01, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Kurtz djkurtz@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Pi-Cheng and Michael,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Pi-Cheng Chen pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org wrote:
From: "pi-cheng.chen" pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org
This patch adds CPU mux clocks which are used by Mediatek cpufreq driver for intermediate clock source switching.
It looks like this patch was never picked up. It is required for MT8173 cpufreq.
What is the plan to get this one merged?
Hi Dan, Mike is working on a new CCF feature called "coordinated clock rate changes" which would help to migrate mt8173-cpufreq driver to generic cpufreq-dt driver, and I am working with him to port MT8173 clock driver on the new feature. So I think that's why this patch was not picked since it will be migrated to new implementation once the new feature's ready.
@Mike: Are you plannig to post those patches on the mailing list ? Or is it fine for you to take this first and then I will refine it for the new feature later?
I plan to post those patches next week.
Were these patches ever posted? Or should we consider going ahead and trying to merge this 4-month old MTK CPU mux clock patch into v4.5 before it is too late?
It's already too late for v4.5. The -rc are mostly bug fixes and new features get merged after the official v4.5 release. They will show up in v4.6-rc1
Which will show up in v4.6-rc1? MediaTek's CPU mux clocks, or Mike's "coordinated clock rate changes"?