On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:19:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2014 11:13:52 Will Deacon wrote:
Just do arm64. We already have the dedicated request for arch/arm/.
I wonder if we should define NT_ARM64_SYSTEM_CALL to the same value as NT_S390_SYSTEM_CALL (0x307), or even define it as an architecture- independent NT_SYSTEM_CALL number with that value, so other architectures don't have to introduce new types when they also want to implement it.
That would be a sane thing to do, so that tools which want to get at this information can do in an almost standardised way for architectures implementing this method.