Mark, Stephen,
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:54:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:04:53PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:23:14PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
From: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org
This is only really needed for gic_write_sgi1r in the !SMP case since it is only referenced in the SMP initialisation code but it seems better to have these functions all next to each other and declared consistently.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Applied to irqchip/urgent
This appears to have disappeared from -next and the warning is back.
Hmm, interesting. Here's what I have in irqchip/for-next,irqchip/urgent:
c44e9d77fd1c irqchip: gic-v3: Tag all low level accessors __maybe_unused ddc86821ee2c irqchip: gic-v3: Only define gic_peek_irq() when building SMP
and:
$ git tag --contains c44e9d77fd1c | grep ^next | sort -V next-20140820 next-20140822 next-20140823 next-20140825 next-20140826 next-20140827 next-20140828 next-20140829
To see whether I forgot to add /urgent to /for-next or if irqchip/for-next was dropped, I did the same search against the first commit I added to irqchip/core:
$ git tag --contains 1c36d42c4ffe | grep ^next | sort -V next-20140822 next-20140823 next-20140825 next-20140826 next-20140827 next-20140828 next-20140829
Also dropped on the 30th. So, unless I really screwed up, -next is no longer pulling irqchip/for-next.
Stephen, could you please look and see if this is the case?
thx,
Jason.