On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:59:38AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Objects of "struct cpufreq_cooling_device" are named a bit inconsistently. Lets use cpufreq_dev everywhere.
Naming is always a matter of taste.. but I frankly cannot see how this patch improves anything here. cpufreq_dev is still misleading.
Here other options: cpufreq_cooling_dev: not misleading but, may a bit too long.. cpufreq_cdev: better, but still, not a char dev
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org