On 12 August 2013 13:05, Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 07:18:10PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
Cc: Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
I'm not copied on the patch that introduces function cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(). So if it does the right/equivalent thing, for cpufreq-cpu0 and imx6q-cpufreq:
You better check it :)
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/266
I wasn't probably following the right way for sending mails as I was expecting people to look at these patches over list..
In the next series with 44 patch I tried to fix this issue. And so cc'd people on cover-letter and the important patch they must check.
Acked-by: Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org
Thanks.