On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The code intializes the cpuidle driver at different places. The cpuidle driver for :
- imx5 : is in the pm-imx5.c, the init function is in cpuidle.c
- imx6 : is in cpuidle-imx6q.c, the init function is in cpuidle.c and cpuidle-imx6q.c
Instead of having the cpuidle code spread across different files, let's write a driver for each SoC and make the code similar.
That implies some code duplication but that will be fixed with the next patches which consolidate the initialization for all the drivers.
IMO, this is unnecessary churn. I agree that we can have cpuidle-imx5.c instead of carrying imx5 cpuidle code in pm-imx5.c. But removing cpuidle.c and duplicating what imx_cpuidle_init() does into imx5 and imx6q driver is a step backward to me.
I suggest simply merging this patch into "[PATCH 18/18] ARM: imx: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine"
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx5.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6q.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++- arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle.c | 80 ------------------------------------- arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle.h | 10 ++--- arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx5.c | 29 +------------- 6 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx5.c delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle.c
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile index c4ce090..bfd5f5b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_IMX) += cpufreq.o ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE),y) obj-y += cpuidle.o
This target should be removed, since arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle.c goes away.
Shawn
+obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX5) += cpuidle-imx5.o obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6Q) += cpuidle-imx6q.o endif