4 Feb
2014
4 Feb
'14
5:45 p.m.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:55:33AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
to be letting the transfer run in the background. Though I suppose that might make sense in some situations...
While I've been thinking about moving more code to the interrupt handler, the current RSPI transfer_one() is indeed still synchronous, so the timeout doesn't apply yet.
OK, that's interesting. Actually one of the things that this refactoring into the core is driving at is that hopefully we'll be able to deploy some of the optimisation techniques like that in the core rather than having individual drivers open coding them - this should on average increase performance.