On 30.03.2016 00:22, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 29 March 2016 at 20:34, Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 29 March 2016 12:09:49 Viresh Kumar wrote:
-static void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void) -{
struct device_node *root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
const struct of_device_id *match;
match = of_match_node(exynos_cpufreq_matches, root);
if (!match) {
platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
return;
}
platform_device_register_simple(match->data, -1, NULL, 0);
-}
How is the "exynos-cpufreq" case handled now? Is that no longer used now? I assume the patch is correct based on Krzysztof's review, but it might be good to explain this better.
That's stale code, the driver got removed some time back.
Yeah, that's old driver, no longer existing. It makes sense to split the patch - first remove the stale exynos-cpufreq and then move cpufreq-dt. This would help avoid confusion when grepping through the history.
Best regards, Krzysztof