Re: [PATCH 1/5] timer: move enum definition out of ifdef section

On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 06:43:38 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote:

On 04/02/2013 01:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

...

Hi,

All 5 in this series applied to linux-pm.git/linux-next.

What am I supposed to do with patches [6-15/15] in your previous series?

Are you going to resend the ones that have been ACKed?

No, please ignore them. After discussing, people want to see the init function in the cpuidle framework not in a generic ARM driver. So I am rewriting the patchset for that.

There are the cleanups before to apply [1], except [4/9] which was already fixed in the OMAP tree.

OK, I'll ignore the rest of that patchset, then.

Thanks, Rafael