On 04/16/2014 10:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Akashi,
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:39:06AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
As done in arm, this change makes it easy to confirm we invoke syscall related hooks, including syscall tracepoint, audit and seccomp which would be implemented later, in correct order. That is, undoing operations in the opposite order on exit that they were done on entry.
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.akashi@linaro.org
[...]
+static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs,
enum ptrace_syscall_dir dir)- int scrach;
s/scrach/scratch/
I will fix it.
Although, I'd rather have a variable with a more meaningful name. How about regno?
OK, I will use regno in the next revision, which I will submit soon.
With that,
Acked-by: Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com
Thank you so much, -Takahiro AKASHI
Cheers,
Will