Cc'ing Rob and Mason.
On 30-03-16, 09:53, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I think it should be something in the /cpus or the /opp_table hierarchy, not the root of the device tree, but other than that I don't care much whether it's a variation of the oppv2 compatible string or an additional property in any of the nodes.
So you mean for future DT files we can have something like this:
cpus { compatible = "operation-points-v2"; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>;
cpu@0 { compatible = "arm,cortex-a9"; reg = <0>; next-level-cache = <&L2>; operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>; }; };
cpu0_opp_table: opp_table0 { opp@1000000000 { opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>; opp-microvolt = <970000 975000 985000>; opp-microamp = <70000>; clock-latency-ns = <300000>; opp-suspend; }; opp@1100000000 { opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>; opp-microvolt = <980000 1000000 1010000>; opp-microamp = <80000>; clock-latency-ns = <310000>; }; }; };
And the cpufreq-dt driver can match /cpus node's compatible string against "operating-points-v2" and create a device at runtime ?
@Rob: Will that be acceptable to you? We are discussing (again) about how to probe cpufreq-dt driver automatically for platforms :)
The cpus node doesn't have any 'compatible' property today, and I will be required to add that in this case.