Re: [Query] CPUFreq: Why do we need policy->user_policy?

On 26 August 2013 20:53, Lan Tianyu lantianyu1986@gmail.com wrote:

So far as I know, it stores some user's config and cpufreq_update_policy() bases on the data in the struct to start a new policy. Cpu thermal driver （/driver/thermal/cpu_cooling.c）also will its value to update freq policy when receive a cpufreq policy adjust notification.

Yeah, but how are these different from policy->min/max/policy/governor? Why do we need to replicate this information?