14 May
2013
14 May
'13
12:36 p.m.
Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on
top
of current linux-next.
I have already done that (attached). But i wasn't sure what Kukjin wants as he may report conflicts again and i will ask the same question for 3.12 :)
Since this missed last time, this would be sent to upstream via samsung tree again. It means the conflicts should be handled by myself.
Rafael, if you don't mind, let me take this into Samsung tree for v3.11.
- Kukjin