On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org wrote:
On 06/03/2013 11:51 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 06/03/2013 10:14 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/31/2013 12:44 PM, Sanjay Singh Rawat wrote:
The current code considers every wakeup as spurious, which is not correct. Handle the same way as other arm platforms are doing.
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat sanjay.rawat@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c index c89672b..a1ab22c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/hotplug.c @@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ static inline void zynq_platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious) dsb(); wfi();
if (pen_release == cpu_logical_map(cpu)) {/** OK, proper wakeup, we're done*/break;}what pen_release stands for? I have looked at it and others platform are also using it in platsmp code which is not zynq case. How is it supposed to work and how this variable should be used?
This variable is used to serialize the secondary cpus boot process.
I'm curious why it is called pen_release. :) Is there some historical link to some HW lines?
When the processors boot, all the processors except the CPU0 are in WFI.