On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 02:43:18PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
2014-03-18 13:02 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org:
if (p) {
memcpy(p + map->patch_regs, regs, num_regs * sizeof(*regs));
map->patch = p;
map->patch_regs += num_regs;
} else {
return -ENOMEM;
}
I think that is not checkpatch-safe :-)
What makes you say that? If you think there's some problem say what it is please...