23 May
2015
23 May
'15
3:41 a.m.
On 23-05-15, 01:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
(The last statement line is likely longer than 80 chars, but that's fine.)
No, it isn't.
I am dropping this patch and merging it with the next one. Otherwise it generates warnings about routine defined but not used. So I will be resending 10/14 and that replaces 9-10/14.
Thanks.
--
viresh