On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:55:32AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
Hin
On 17 September 2013 12:29, Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com wrote:
Arnaldo, Ingo,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:17:32AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
The newly added dwarf unwinding feature [1] requires: . a recent version (>= 1.1) of libunwind, . libunwind to be configured with --enable-debug-frame.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1598951.html
Add the corresponding API test in the feature check list.
Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet jean.pihet@linaro.org
tools/perf/config/Makefile | 2 +- tools/perf/config/feature-tests.mak | 11 ++++++++++- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Can I have an ack for this and the following patch please?
(http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-September/198531....)
Then I can stick these into -next for some more exposure before I queue them for 3.13.
Cheers,
Will
Ping on the series. The two patches above (3/4 and 4/4) are generic while the two others are impacting ARM only. Is it possible to get an Ack for the generic ones?
I'm fine with those changes.. still I'm sort of worried about current DWARF unwind users (but not sure if there're any), who depends on packaged libunwind compiled without --enable-debug-frame option.
I've seen your libunwind patch to make it default, but not sure if it was accepted.. if not, maybe we should detect this and build that code conditionaly.
thoughts anyone? jirka