8 Jan
2014
8 Jan
'14
8:37 a.m.
On 01/07/2014 11:37 PM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
So something like:
avg = runnable + p(i) * blocked; where p(i) \e [0,1]
could maybe be used to replace the cpu_load array and still represent the concept of looking at a bigger picture for larger sets. Leaving open the details of the map p.
Figuring out p is the difficult bit. AFAIK, with blocked load in its current form we don't have any clue when a task will reappear.
Yes, that's why we can not find a suitable way to consider the blocked load in load balance.
--
Thanks
Alex