On Saturday, August 03, 2013 06:58:35 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 3 August 2013 17:37, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
On Saturday, August 03, 2013 05:19:18 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Rafael,
This patchset tries to fix & cleanup many existing cpufreq core issues. First four patches tries to cleanup basic problems in cpufreq core. Its first patch was earlier sent separately but now is part of this series.
Fifth patch was also sent earlier as reply to your patches and was reviewed by Srivatsa. Sixth patch was picked from Lukasz's patchset on introducing software "boost" feature in core. It will be used by this patchset.
And last four are the most significant part of this set. They try to make many things simple and robust.
This is rebased of your bleeding-edge branch + two patches from you: 18a6b03 cpufreq: Avoid double kobject_put() for the same kobject in error code path d0cde63 cpufreq: Do not hold driver module references for additional policy CPUs abe513f Merge branch 'acpi-sleep-next' into linux-next
They are also pushed in my cpufreq-next branch
How much testing has that received so far?
I planned to add this information but forgot at the last moment. It was partially tested. As it was mostly developed over the weekend I wasn't able to do much of testing. I posted it to get early comments, and testing would complete by beginning of next week.
OK, thanks!