2 Sep
2014
2 Sep
'14
7:09 a.m.
On 2 September 2014 12:32, Yuantian Tang Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com wrote:
I am saying your patch 2 probably is wrong, not patch 1.
Okay, it looked initially that both are screwed up :)
Consider following case: On T4240 platform, we have 3 cluster with 8 cpu in each cluster. We offline 4 5 6 7 cpu and then online them back.
i.e. last four CPUs of first cluster..
Cpu 4's policy->cpus is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 Cpu 5's policy->cpus is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
How? And how is this patch going to touch policy->cpus? CPU 0-7 should be sharing a single 'struct cpufreq_policy' and so policy->cpus should be same for all..