On Friday, June 07, 2013 10:48:21 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 31 May 2013 16:20, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
On 20 May 2013 10:10, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
On 13 May 2013 11:34, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
On 22 April 2013 12:19, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
On 9 April 2013 14:05, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:16, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote: > On 4 April 2013 18:24, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote: >> This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq. >> >> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt benh@kernel.crashing.org >> Cc: Paul Mackerras paulus@samba.org >> Cc: Olof Johansson olof@lixom.net >> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org >> --- >> Compile Tested only. >> >> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig | 31 ---------------------- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/Makefile | 1 - >> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile | 2 -- >> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.powerpc | 26 ++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 3 +++ >> .../cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 0 >> .../cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 0 >> .../cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 0 >> 8 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) >> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c (100%) >> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c (100%) >> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_64.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c (100%) > > Hi Deepthi, > > Can you help testing this please?
Ping!!
Ping!!
Hi Benjamin,
Hope you are back from your vacations. Can you give it a try now?
Ping!!
Ping!!
Hi Rafael,
Its been more than 2 months now that this patch was first posted. And the response from Maintainers isn't so great, irrespective of how many times I pinged them.
This is what I think:
- It looked functionally correct to Benjamin but he wanted somebody
to actually test it.
- Arnd gave his Ack (So it looked functionally correct to him too)
- We can probably push this into linux-next now and see if somebody
complains of any breakage it has done. If not we can get it pushed for 3.11.
I agree, applied to bleeding-edge.
Thanks, Rafael