On 12/31/2013 12:17 PM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
Hi Daniel,
This patch looks correct to me. Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thanks Preeti for the review.
-- Daniel
mailto:preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org mailto:daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
The cpu parameter is no longer needed in nohz_balancer_kick, let's remove the parameter. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org <mailto:daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 1f7ed1a..c647c45 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -6517,7 +6517,7 @@ static inline int find_new_ilb(void) * nohz_load_balancer CPU (if there is one) otherwise fallback to any idle * CPU (if there is one). */ -static void nohz_balancer_kick(int cpu) +static void nohz_balancer_kick(void) { int ilb_cpu; @@ -6871,15 +6871,13 @@ static inline int on_null_domain(struct rq *rq) */ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq) { - int cpu = rq->cpu; - /* Don't need to rebalance while attached to NULL domain */ if (time_after_eq(jiffies, rq->next_balance) && likely(!on_null_domain(rq))) raise_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ); #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON if (nohz_kick_needed(rq) && likely(!on_null_domain(rq))) - nohz_balancer_kick(cpu); + nohz_balancer_kick(); #endif } -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/