27 Nov
2013
27 Nov
'13
3:07 a.m.
On 27 November 2013 07:12, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:
Anyway, if you did what I asked you to do and put the cpufreq suspend/resume into dpm_suspend/resume_noirq(), I'd probably take this for 3.13. However, since you've decided to put those things somewhere else thus making the change much more intrusive, I can only queue it up for 3.14.
This means I'm going to take the Tianyu's patch as a stop gap for 3.13.
There were design issues with that patch actually, as I pointed out earlier (handling EXIT part in core and INIT in governors).. And so in case we need to get something for v3.13, I will send a short version of this series with callbacks from suspend_noirq.
Get that one instead.
-- viresh