On 01/06/2014 12:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
I understand. Happy new year !
Happy new year to you too! :-)
ps : the patchset is based on tip/sched/core
Weird; because tip/sched/core as per today looks like:
029632fbb7b7c kernel/sched_fair.c (Peter Zijlstra 2011-10-25 10:00:11 +0200 6872) void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
And your patches assume it looks like:
Patch 1: @@ -6878,7 +6878,7 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq) Patch 2: @@ -6875,10 +6875,10 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq) Patch 4: void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq) {
int cpu = rq->cpu;Which obviously doesn't quite work..
So I can make it fit.. but I do wonder what I'm missing here..
Ah, ok. I got it. I missed to send the first patch of my patchset:
sched: reduce trigger_load_balance parameters
Let me resend the patchset with the missing patch.
Sorry for the inconvenience
-- Daniel