CPUFreq core doesn't control value of .driver_data and this field is completely driver specific. This can contain any value and not only indexes. For most of the drivers, which aren't using this field, its value is zero. So, printing this from core doesn't make any sense. Don't print it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org --- V1->V2: No Change
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c index 65a4770..53ff3c2 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c @@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, && table[i].driver_data == CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ) continue;
- pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz, %u driver_data\n", - i, freq, table[i].driver_data); + pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz\n", i, freq); if (freq < min_freq) min_freq = freq; if (freq > max_freq) @@ -175,8 +174,8 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, } else *index = optimal.driver_data;
- pr_debug("target is %u (%u kHz, %u)\n", *index, table[*index].frequency, - table[*index].driver_data); + pr_debug("target index is %u, freq is:%u kHz\n", *index, + table[*index].frequency);
return 0; }