On 11.04.2014 10:30, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 04/10/2014 05:34 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 10.04.2014 16:23, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 04/10/2014 03:57 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 10.04.2014 11:55, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
One more step is moving the clock ratio setting at idle time in pm.c
The macro names have been changed to be consistent with the other macros name in the file.
Note, the clock divider was working only when cpuidle was enabled because it was in its init routine. With this change, the clock divider is set in the pm's init routine, so it will also operate when the cpuidle driver is not set, which is good.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnierkie@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa t.figa@samsung.com
arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 54
arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 19 ++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
Sorry that I didn't mention that before, but now I recall that there was already a similar patch moving this code to Exynos5250 clock driver, which is the best place for setup of any CMU registers and a step towards removing one more static IO mapping.
Yes, Bartlomiej mentioned it.
Is it possible to merge this mentioned patch or to give a pointer to it so I can integrate it into the patchset ?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138147021207626&w=2
I wonder if it still applies cleanly, though...
Ok, if I refer to the date, this patch has been lost in the limbus. So I can integrate it with my patchset without conflicting with any tree. Right ?
As I suspected, it doesn't apply onto current sources. I have attached a rebased version. Feel free to send it as a part of next version of your series.
Best regards, Tomasz