On Monday 03 February 2014 18:33:48 Liviu Dudau wrote:
+/**
- pci_host_bridge_of_get_ranges - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT
 
- @dev: device node of the host bridge having the range property
 
- @resources: list where the range of resources will be added after DT parsing
 
- This function will parse the "ranges" property of a PCI host bridge device
 
- node and setup the resource mapping based on its content. It is expected
 
- that the property conforms with the Power ePAPR document.
 
- Each architecture will then apply their filtering based on the limitations
 
- of each platform. One general restriction seems to be the number of IO space
 
- ranges, the PCI framework makes intensive use of struct resource management,
 
- and for IORESOURCE_IO types they can only be requested if they are contained
 
- within the global ioport_resource, so that should be limited to one IO space
 
- range.
 
Actually we have quite a different set of restrictions around I/O space on ARM32 at the moment: Each host bridge can have its own 64KB range in an arbitrary location on MMIO space, and the total must not exceed 2MB of I/O space.
- */
 +static int pci_host_bridge_of_get_ranges(struct device_node *dev,
struct list_head *resources)+{
- struct resource *res;
 - struct of_pci_range range;
 - struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
 - int err;
 - pr_info("PCI host bridge %s ranges:\n", dev->full_name);
 - /* Check for ranges property */
 - err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev);
 - if (err)
 return err;- pr_debug("Parsing ranges property...\n");
 - for_each_of_pci_range(&parser, &range) {
 /* Read next ranges element */pr_debug("pci_space: 0x%08x pci_addr:0x%016llx ",range.pci_space, range.pci_addr);pr_debug("cpu_addr:0x%016llx size:0x%016llx\n",range.cpu_addr, range.size);/* If we failed translation or got a zero-sized region* (some FW try to feed us with non sensical zero sized regions* such as power3 which look like some kind of attempt* at exposing the VGA memory hole) then skip this range*/if (range.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || range.size == 0)continue;res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);if (!res) {err = -ENOMEM;goto bridge_ranges_nomem;}of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev, res);pci_add_resource_offset(resources, res,range.cpu_addr - range.pci_addr);- }
 
I believe of_pci_range_to_resource() will return the MMIO aperture for the I/O space window here, which is not what you are supposed to pass into pci_add_resource_offset.
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_host_bridge_of_init);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index 6e34498..16febae 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -1787,6 +1787,17 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus, list_for_each_entry_safe(window, n, resources, list) { list_move_tail(&window->list, &bridge->windows); res = window->res;
/** IO resources are stored in the kernel with a CPU start* address of zero. Adjust the data accordingly and remember* the offset*/if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_IO) {bridge->io_offset = res->start;res->end -= res->start;window->offset -= res->start;res->start = 0; offset = window->offset; if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_BUS)}
Won't this break all existing host bridges?
Arnd