On 9 July 2014 20:14, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilimkar@ti.com wrote:
Assuming you are updating bidnings as suggested by Stephen, patch looks good to me. Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilimkar@ti.com
Why do you still have a separate cpufreq driver for omap? Would this patch help getting that out?
I see this for omap:
static inline void omap_init_cpufreq(void) { struct platform_device_info devinfo = { };
if (!of_have_populated_dt()) devinfo.name = "omap-cpufreq"; else devinfo.name = "cpufreq-generic"; platform_device_register_full(&devinfo); }
and it makes me believe that you were just waiting for this patch?