On 08/07/2013 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:48:54 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
Rafael, offline question:
Not really offline. :-)
:D..
On 08/06/2013 09:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 08:08:20 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
change in subject to reflect new discussion.
On 05:53-20130806, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/03/2013 02:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
Could it be renamed to pm_opp_add() or power_opp_add() ? The name is a bit too unspecific IMO.
Though this has nothing specific with this patch, an interesting point.
git grep -w opp . showed drivers/tty/n_tty.c, drivers/sbus/char/openprom.c and arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c using variables named opp to mean what ever they had in context. rest(around 40 odd files) seem to use opp as in Documentation/power/opp.txt..
We could go with a pm_ prefix or even dev_pm_opp_ prefix to be more specific, though I prefer just pm_. If Rafael and others are ok, I can post a series out.
Yup, that would be useful. I'm for dev_pm_opp_ if that matters.
Given that there would be quiet a few conflicts, do you have a suggestion around what baseline I should submit this?
Well, ideally, on top of 3.12-rc1 when it's out and put it into linux-next right after that.
Will do. Thanks on the hint.