On 5 January 2015 at 12:44, Luigi Fioretti luigi.fioretti@dinema.it wrote:
Hi, thanks for your help but I don't think to be solution. I had apply this patch :
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-December/036055.h...
You can read the first problems here: http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-kernel/2014-March/012635.html
I had found a solution to this problem, and I write to you into my first e-mail. Now I have this problems: When resume and run this function
What does all this has to do with the mail below ?
-----linaro-kernel-bounces@lists.linaro.org ha scritto: ----- Per: "Rafael J. Wysocki" rjw@rjwysocki.net Da: Viresh Kumar Inviato da: linaro-kernel-bounces@lists.linaro.org Data: 05/01/2015 05.05AM Cc: Prarit Bhargava prarit@redhat.com, Lists linaro-kernel linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Saravana Kannan skannan@codeaurora.org, "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Oggetto: Re: [PATCH V2 04/14] cpufreq: stats: pass 'stat' to cpufreq_stats_update() *
On 4 January 2015 at 03:34, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:
What about:
"It is better to pass a struct cpufreq_stats pointer to cpufreq_stats_update() instead of a CPU number, because ..."
Sure.
+static int cpufreq_stats_update(struct cpufreq_stats *stat) {
struct cpufreq_stats *stat;unsigned long long cur_time;
unsigned long long cur_time = get_jiffies_64();
cur_time = get_jiffies_64();Unrelated change.
Yeah, it was too small of a change so not that significant as well. And so folded it into this commit only :(
Will send it separately in v3..
linaro-kernel mailing list linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel