2 Nov
2015
2 Nov
'15
3:13 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
On 30-10-15, 15:18, Stephen Boyd wrote:
A side-note. I wonder if it would be better style to have the node name be:
opp@600000000 {I thought the @... had a special meaning and we might end up creating some device for the node then? Perhaps I am mistaken.
There is no special meaning, just convention which is the unit-address should match the reg property address. I'm okay with an exception here.
Rob