Re: [PATCH 04/18] cpufreq: Manage fallback policies in a list

On 5 February 2015 at 23:11, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:

I'm still concerned about the case when the last policy CPU is physically going away, in which we do the offline as a preliminary step and then will go for full CPU device unregistration.

I need more clarity on how this happens. So, on a physical hotplug out: - We first do cpu offline, i.e. hotplug notifier gets called. - And then during unregistration the sysfs remove will get called?

I haven't taken care of this as I never understood what actually happens in terms of code sequencing ..

Will take care of that in next revision once I get answers to above queries.

-- viresh