On Mon, 05 Dec 2016, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
On 12/02/2016 02:22 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
Add general purpose timers and it sub-nodes into DT for stm32f4. Define and enable pwm1 and pwm3 for stm32f469 discovery board
version 3:
- use "st,stm32-timer-trigger" in DT
version 2:
- use parameters to describe hardware capabilities
- do not use references for pwm and iio timer subnodes
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard benjamin.gaignard@st.com
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi | 333 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts | 28 +++ 2 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[...]
If you're only commenting on a little piece of the patch, it's always a good idea to trim the rest.
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts index 8a163d7..df4ca7e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts @@ -81,3 +81,31 @@ &usart3 { status = "okay"; };
+&gptimer1 {
- status = "okay";
- pwm1@0 {
pinctrl-0 = <&pwm1_pins>;pinctrl-names = "default";status = "okay";- };
- timer1@0 {
status = "okay";- };
+};
This is a much *better* format than before.
I still don't like the '&' syntax though.
Please keep "&" format to match with existing nodes.
Right. I wasn't suggesting that he differs from the current format in *this* set. I am suggesting that we change the format in a subsequent set though.
+&gptimer3 {
- status = "okay";
- pwm3@0 {
pinctrl-0 = <&pwm3_pins>;pinctrl-names = "default";status = "okay";- };
- timer3@0 {
status = "okay";- };
+};