Hi Christoffer,
On 31 March 2014 14:36, Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org wrote:
I think Marc brought up the point previously that we may get to PSCI spec v42.17 and the defines should perhaps encompass the version we are defining things for right now...
That being said, assuming new spec versions don't break backwards compatibility in the numbering, the wording proposed by your patch does look simpler.
I do like the hardcoded IDs because that's how it's presented in the spec itself.
Cool. I'll just add the following line in kbuild to this patch and resend.
include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 +
+header-y += psci.h
Meanwhile, if there are any strong preferences to using the uapi header in Anup's patch, then I can rebase later.
Thanks, Ashwin