Around Tue 13 Aug 2013 19:00:22 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 13 August 2013 14:39, Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
Yes, that's what.. That generic routine can be used instead of your .verify()..
So here is a patch for that which I will include in my original series. It uses functions from this patch:
Great. Is there anything left for the at32ap cpufreq driver?
-----------x-------------------x---------------------
commit e02892f73f8f669b265310e51a677c7253e32389 Author: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org Date: Fri Aug 9 12:05:56 2013 +0530
cpufreq: at32ap: Use generic cpufreq routines Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and.verify() routines and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used by cpufreq drivers then.
This patch uses these generic routines for this driver. Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt egtvedt@samfundet.no
drivers/cpufreq/at32ap-cpufreq.c | 12 +----------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
<snipp diff>