On Friday, June 19, 2015 05:18:06 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Some information is common to all CPUs belonging to a policy, but are kept on per-cpu basis. Lets keep that in another structure common to all policy->cpus. That will make updates/reads to that less complex and less error prone.
The memory for ccdbs is allocated/freed at INIT/EXIT, so that it we don't reallocate it for STOP/START sequence. It will be also be used (in next patch) while the governor is stopped and so must not be freed that early.
Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 18 ++++--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 24 +++++---- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 38 +++++++------- 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c index af47d322679e..5b5c01ca556c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners, static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load) { struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.policy;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy; struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
@@ -106,22 +106,24 @@ static void cs_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work) { struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = container_of(work, struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s, cdbs.dwork.work);
- unsigned int cpu = dbs_info->cdbs.policy->cpu;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
- unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *core_dbs_info = &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = dbs_info->cdbs.policy->governor_data;
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data; struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; int delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(cs_tuners->sampling_rate); bool modify_all = true;
- mutex_lock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
- if (!need_load_eval(&core_dbs_info->cdbs, cs_tuners->sampling_rate))
- mutex_lock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
- if (!need_load_eval(core_dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs,
modify_all = false; else dbs_check_cpu(dbs_data, cpu);cs_tuners->sampling_rate))
- gov_queue_work(dbs_data, dbs_info->cdbs.policy, delay, modify_all);
- mutex_unlock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
- gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, delay, modify_all);
- mutex_unlock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
} static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, @@ -135,7 +137,7 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, if (!dbs_info->enable) return 0;
- policy = dbs_info->cdbs.policy;
- policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
/* * we only care if our internally tracked freq moves outside the 'valid' diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c index c0566f86caed..72a92fa71ba5 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu) struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu); struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cdbs->ccdbs->policy; unsigned int sampling_rate; unsigned int max_load = 0; unsigned int ignore_nice;
@@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu) ignore_nice = cs_tuners->ignore_nice_load; }
- policy = cdbs->policy;
- /* Get Absolute Load */ for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) { struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs;
@@ -209,17 +207,18 @@ static inline void gov_cancel_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, } /* Will return if we need to evaluate cpu load again or not */ -bool need_load_eval(struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs, unsigned int sampling_rate) +bool need_load_eval(struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs,
unsigned int sampling_rate)
{
- if (policy_is_shared(cdbs->policy)) {
- if (policy_is_shared(ccdbs->policy)) { ktime_t time_now = ktime_get();
s64 delta_us = ktime_us_delta(time_now, cdbs->time_stamp);
s64 delta_us = ktime_us_delta(time_now, ccdbs->time_stamp);
/* Do nothing if we recently have sampled */ if (delta_us < (s64)(sampling_rate / 2)) return false; else
cdbs->time_stamp = time_now;
}ccdbs->time_stamp = time_now;
return true; @@ -238,6 +237,37 @@ static void set_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, } } +static int alloc_ccdbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct common_dbs_data *cdata)
+{
- struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs;
- int j;
- /* Allocate memory for the common information for policy->cpus */
- ccdbs = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccdbs), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!ccdbs)
return -ENOMEM;
- /* Set ccdbs for all CPUs, online+offline */
- for_each_cpu(j, policy->related_cpus)
cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(j)->ccdbs = ccdbs;
- return 0;
+}
+static void free_ccdbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct common_dbs_data *cdata)
+{
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
- struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
- int j;
- for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus)
cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(j)->ccdbs = NULL;
- kfree(ccdbs);
+}
static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct dbs_data *dbs_data, struct common_dbs_data *cdata) @@ -248,6 +278,11 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (dbs_data) { if (WARN_ON(have_governor_per_policy())) return -EINVAL;
ret = alloc_ccdbs(policy, cdata);
if (ret)
return ret;
- dbs_data->usage_count++; policy->governor_data = dbs_data; return 0;
@@ -257,12 +292,16 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (!dbs_data) return -ENOMEM;
- ret = alloc_ccdbs(policy, cdata);
- if (ret)
goto free_dbs_data;
- dbs_data->cdata = cdata; dbs_data->usage_count = 1;
ret = cdata->init(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized); if (ret)
goto free_dbs_data;
goto free_ccdbs;
/* policy latency is in ns. Convert it to us first */ latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / 1000; @@ -299,6 +338,8 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, } cdata_exit: cdata->exit(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized); +free_ccdbs:
- free_ccdbs(policy, cdata);
free_dbs_data: kfree(dbs_data); return ret; @@ -322,6 +363,8 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, cdata->exit(dbs_data, policy->governor->initialized == 1); kfree(dbs_data); }
- free_ccdbs(policy, cdata);
} static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, @@ -330,6 +373,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata; unsigned int sampling_rate, ignore_nice, j, cpu = policy->cpu; struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
- struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs; int io_busy = 0;
if (!policy->cur) @@ -348,11 +392,14 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, io_busy = od_tuners->io_is_busy; }
- ccdbs->policy = policy;
- ccdbs->time_stamp = ktime_get();
- mutex_init(&ccdbs->timer_mutex);
- for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) { struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(j); unsigned int prev_load;
j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall, io_busy);j_cdbs->policy = policy;
@@ -364,7 +411,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (ignore_nice) j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&j_cdbs->dwork, cdata->gov_dbs_timer); }mutex_init(&j_cdbs->timer_mutex);
@@ -384,9 +430,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, od_ops->powersave_bias_init_cpu(cpu); }
- /* Initiate timer time stamp */
- cdbs->time_stamp = ktime_get();
- gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, delay_for_sampling_rate(sampling_rate), true); return 0;
@@ -398,6 +441,9 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata; unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
- struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
- gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
if (cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) { struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *cs_dbs_info = @@ -406,10 +452,8 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, cs_dbs_info->enable = 0; }
- gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
- mutex_destroy(&cdbs->timer_mutex);
- cdbs->policy = NULL;
- ccdbs->policy = NULL;
- mutex_destroy(&ccdbs->timer_mutex);
} static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, @@ -419,18 +463,18 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
- if (!cdbs->policy)
- if (!cdbs->ccdbs || !cdbs->ccdbs->policy) return;
- mutex_lock(&cdbs->timer_mutex);
- if (policy->max < cdbs->policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->policy, policy->max,
- mutex_lock(&cdbs->ccdbs->timer_mutex);
- if (policy->max < cdbs->ccdbs->policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->ccdbs->policy, policy->max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
- else if (policy->min > cdbs->policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->policy, policy->min,
- else if (policy->min > cdbs->ccdbs->policy->cur)
dbs_check_cpu(dbs_data, cpu);__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->ccdbs->policy, policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
- mutex_unlock(&cdbs->timer_mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&cdbs->ccdbs->timer_mutex);
} int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h index a0f8eb79ee6d..153412cafb05 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h @@ -128,6 +128,18 @@ static void *get_cpu_dbs_info_s(int cpu) \
- cs_*: Conservative governor
*/ +/* Common to all CPUs of a policy */ +struct cpu_common_dbs_info {
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
- /*
* percpu mutex that serializes governor limit change with gov_dbs_timer
* invocation. We do not want gov_dbs_timer to run when user is changing
* the governor or limits.
*/
- struct mutex timer_mutex;
- ktime_t time_stamp;
+};
/* Per cpu structures */ struct cpu_dbs_info { u64 prev_cpu_idle; @@ -140,15 +152,8 @@ struct cpu_dbs_info { * wake-up from idle. */ unsigned int prev_load;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy; struct delayed_work dwork;
- /*
* percpu mutex that serializes governor limit change with gov_dbs_timer
* invocation. We do not want gov_dbs_timer to run when user is changing
* the governor or limits.
*/
- struct mutex timer_mutex;
- ktime_t time_stamp;
- struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs;
I don't like this new field name to be honest. It's just too cryptic to me.
Why don't you simply call it "common" or "shared", for example?
}; struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s { @@ -264,7 +269,8 @@ static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_min_gov_pol \ extern struct mutex cpufreq_governor_lock; void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu); -bool need_load_eval(struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs, unsigned int sampling_rate); +bool need_load_eval(struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs,
unsigned int sampling_rate);
int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct common_dbs_data *cdata, unsigned int event); void gov_queue_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, struct cpufreq_policy *policy, diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c index d29c6f9c6e3e..651677cfa581 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static void dbs_freq_increase(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq) static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load) { struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.policy;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
If you rename ccdbs to "shared" that will look as follows:
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.shared->policy;
which is way more readable to me.
Thanks, Rafael