On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 07:01:04 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Rafael/Russell,
These patches would be part of this patchset finally, sending it separately as I didn't wanted to send other patches in that series..
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/10/48
(Above series was rebased over https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/263 and hence this patchset too)..
These first exposes frequency table and then uses cpufreq generic routines (which uses exposed table) instead of its own .verify() routine.
Later I will send another patch that would be part of this series:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/12/406
(I need to send that series again today and so not sending that patch twice, once here and then in that series)..
All these patches are pushed here with all dependencies:
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git%3Ba=shortlog%3Bh=re...
Are the three patches in this series prerequisite for the big target_index one? If so, I think they can go into 3.12 actually, if they are ACKed by the appropriate platform maintainers.
Viresh Kumar (3): cpufreq: sa11x0: Expose frequency table cpufreq: sa11x0: let cpufreq core initialize struct policy fields cpufreq: sa11x0: Use generic cpufreq routines
arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.c | 65 +++++++++++++--------------------------- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.h | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 9 +++--- drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 9 +++--- 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
Thanks, Rafael