3 Sep
2014
3 Sep
'14
9:44 a.m.
On 02/09/14 22:36, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On 2 Sep 2014, at 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux linux@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c index 4b959e6..423707c 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h> +#ifdef CONFIG_FIQ +#include <asm/fiq.h> +#endif
Is there much advantage to this ifdef over providing a dummy asm/fiq.h in ARM64?
While it’s unlikely we’ll use FIQs on arm64 (they are generally reserved for the secure world/firmware), I don’t mind an empty asm/fiq.h file.
Thanks Catalin, Thanks Russell.
I will do this.