On May 7, 2014, at 17:05, Kevin Hilman khilman@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Jason Cooper jason@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Well, the question I have now: how far along was the multi_v7 effort at v3.10? Was a multi_v7 v3.10 kernel actually usable, assuming the config options were set properly?
It's usable for the very basic boot to initramfs that my board farm is doing, but it's probably not usable for any "real" usecase. For that, I suspect a bunch more defconfig backports would probably be needed.
If it wasn't then yeah, lets stop booting v3.10 multi_v7. If it was, then I'll put together the email to stable for the patches to be backported.
The more I think about it, these probably don't really qualify as stable material, since we probably shouldn't pretend that multi_v7_defconfig is "stable" and really usable on v3.10 anyways.
Agreed.
thx,
Jason.