9 Jul
2014
9 Jul
'14
3:08 p.m.
On 9 July 2014 20:12, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilimkar@ti.com wrote:
Not related to this patch but I think its time to change the name of this driver. I never liked this 'cpufreq-cpu0.c' and already mentioned that during the reviews of this driver.
Not sure if there are still sentiments about it but considering the additional functionality coming in, the name will definitely miss-leading.
Check last patch, its called cpufreq-generic now.