On 10-04-17, 08:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think.
Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARMv7 and ARMv8) through my tree but I already sent a pull request so I am fine with this going directly to arm-soc.
This may end up going via the PM tree.
I think you need to update also: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt
Oops. I searched for opp@ and missed the complex ones. There are some DT files as well for TI which I missed. Will send a V2 with all that fixed.
With that change: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk@kernel.org (and implied acked-by)
Thanks.