On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 04-10-16, 15:41, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 16-09-16, 08:56, Viresh Kumar wrote:
These can fit in a single line (80 columns), don't split lines unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
V1->V2: New patch
drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Ping!!
Don't do that!
Okay, but what's exactly wrong with that? Its been 20 days that I have heard anything from you on this. Pinging the maintainers is the only option other people have, right?
You are experienced enough to know better than this.
a) Contentless pings have never been acceptable. If you genuinely think a patch has been forgotten you should resubmit with a [RESEND]. That is their entire purpose.
b) You submitted this patch right at the end of the release cycle, and your ping was sent during the merge-window. Most Maintainers, myself included, like to have patches soak tested in -next for at least a couple of weeks prior to acceptance.
c) The merge-window is open. We are likely conducting final tests and formatting pull-requests during this time. As an experienced submitter, I would have expected you to follow the release cycle and know that sending patches late is cause for delay.
d) Maintainers take vacations and attend conferences, so some delays are to be expected.
FYI: Your patch has not slipped through the net. It is in the pile to be reviewed. Please be more patient, especially around merge time.