5 Apr
2013
5 Apr
'13
11:36 a.m.
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim kgene.kim@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this should be sent to upstream via samsung tree.
Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it doesn't mean that it can't be moved to your tree if there is a issue.
Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree.
Thanks, Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.