On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 13:50 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Which is a problem how?
So here is a possible scenario, CPU 0 reads a kcpustat value, and CPU 1 writes it at the same time:
//Initial value of "cpustat" is 0xffffffff == CPU 0 == == CPU 1 == //load low part mov %eax, [cpustat] inc [cpustat] //Update the high part if necessary jnc 1f inc [cpustat + 4] 1: //load high part mov %edx, [cpustat + 4]
Afterward, CPU 0 will think the value is 0x1ffffffff while it's actually 0x100000000.
atomic64_read() and atomic64_set() are supposed to take care of that, without even the need for _inc() or _add() parts that use LOCK.
Sure I get that, but again, why is that a problem,.. who relies on these statistics that makes it a problem?