2 Aug
2013
2 Aug
'13
7:16 a.m.
On 2 August 2013 12:39, Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I guess you are printing it at an odd time, when the module is still running its init function. Perhaps the core kernel module infrastructure increments the refcount around that region temporarily?
If I think logically, that sounds correct. I haven't looked at the implementation details though. But yes, I understood why my refcount was incremented :)
Thanks.