11 Feb
2016
11 Feb
'16
11:46 a.m.
On 11-02-16, 02:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
And one question tangentially related to this patch: Would it be possible to avoid calling __cpufreq_governor(_EXIT) for CPU offline?
The fact that we still carry out the whole governor teardown at that point is slightly disturbing, as in theory it should be possible to keep the governor attributes in place across offline/online.
Will think about that after the current code is stable a bit. It should be possible, but need to see if it is worth it.
--
viresh