Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task

On 14-11-16, 10:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

Any static prio value is wrong (static prio assignment requires system knowledge that the kernel doesn't and cannot have), 50 is what threaded IRQs default too as well IIRC, so it would at least be consistent with that.

Yes you are correct and I have found a better way of defining the priority in this case using that code instead of magic figure 50.

MAX_USER_RT_PRIO/2 :)