Hi Jiri,
On 12-08-15, 15:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
IS_ERR_VALUE() already contains it and so we need to add this only to the !ptr check. That will allow users of IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), to not add this compiler flag.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
include/linux/err.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/err.h b/include/linux/err.h index a729120644d5..56762ab41713 100644 --- a/include/linux/err.h +++ b/include/linux/err.h @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR(__force const void *ptr) static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) {
- return !ptr || IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
- return unlikely(!ptr) || IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
}
Thanks for applying rest of the patches, but this is the most important one. Can you please apply this one as well ?