Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator

On Monday, August 12, 2013 10:49:46 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:

On 9 August 2013 23:36, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:

...

From: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org

Since NULL could in theory be a valid regulator we ought to check for IS_ERR() rather than for NULL. In practice this is unlikely to be an issue but it's better for neatness.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org

drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Makes sense.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org

Queued up for 3.12.

Thanks, Rafael